Comments - 聲明 | Penana

/comment.php?chapter=0&id=156845

Comments - 聲明 | Penana

Comments - 聲明

Search stories, writers or societies

Continue ReadingClear All

More

What Others Are ReadingRefresh

See more results for ""

X

Never miss what's happening on Penana!

Turn on notifications

Login with Facebook or Sign up/Login to leave a comment.

sponsored 1!

我是覺得互罵就不需要了，網路的傷害真的很大，即使可能相互聽不進，但雙方有傳達本意，平安落幕就好。
中間人相信他的出發點是好的，但若只有單方傳話其實沒必要

10 months agoReply

sponsored 100!

12在此其中卻不斷大賞P幣，除了中間人的用意不懂，這段也看不太懂

10 months agoReply

sponsored 100!

12僅靠中間人協調導致溝通有落差的意思為何？
中間人不就是選擇兩邊可以信任且能雙方溝通了解狀況，必要時可以三方協調嗎？
如果你說的中間人是只單方傳話，那這樣容易會造成傳話錯誤，畢竟人和人直接溝通都容易發生誤會了，中間人角色的意義是什麼呢？

10 months agoReply

sponsored 55!

其實這種事情就是比哪邊支持者比較多而已

10 months agoReply

sponsored 100!

一劍有寫到A的態度不友善所以才沒能再次私訊A吧，希望彼此都能平息下來

10 months agoReply

Show more...

×

Reading Theme:

Font Size:

Line Spacing:

Paragraph Spacing:

Load the next issue automatically

Reset to default

X

× People Who Like This

×

Install this webapp for easier offline reading: tap and then Add to home screen.